fix ebuild

sys-apps/portage/files/README.RESCUE

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Please see https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Fixing_broken_portage
+for a recovery guide for a broken portage installation.

sys-apps/portage/files/depgraph.py-fix-no-ebuilds-binpkgs-message.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From b199d0307b47f9fb06dbe533d7e24926a561c238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncoredxx@gmail.com>
+Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 00:08:27 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] depgraph.py: fix "no ebuilds/binpkgs" message
+
+The "there are no binary packages to satisfy" was being unconditionally
+output for packages that could not be found. Fix the logic for choosing
+between the "binary packages" and "ebuilds" form of the message.
+
+This is a temporary stopgap as alluded to by me in the bug, but the
+tl;dr is that some entries in the `myopts` dict have "y"/"n" values
+whereas some are True/unset, and this discrepancy should be sorted out.
+
+[sam: Add NEWS and Fixes, although the change in that commit _shouldn't_
+have been wrong, it is because of a quirk for now...]
+
+[oskari: remove NEWS for backport]
+
+Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/909853
+Signed-off-by: Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncoredxx@gmail.com>
+Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/1065
+Fixes: 0b21a5a392bd84c07b94373991f59108fbe98516
+Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
+---
+ lib/_emerge/depgraph.py | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/_emerge/depgraph.py b/lib/_emerge/depgraph.py
+index a36ab6351..1aeae6257 100644
+--- a/lib/_emerge/depgraph.py
++++ b/lib/_emerge/depgraph.py
+@@ -6456,7 +6456,7 @@ class depgraph:
+                     cp_exists = True
+                     break
+ 
+-            if self._frozen_config.myopts.get("--usepkgonly", "y"):
++            if self._frozen_config.myopts.get("--usepkgonly", False):
+                 writemsg(
+                     f"\nemerge: there are no binary packages to satisfy {green(xinfo)}.\n",
+                     noiselevel=-1,
+-- 
+2.41.0
+

sys-apps/portage/files/portage-3.0.49-prefixify-init-script-shebangs.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=6066bb766f43ca06a5b0f08baa5946ff678f0c29
+
+From 6066bb766f43ca06a5b0f08baa5946ff678f0c29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Benda Xu <orv@debian.org>
+Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 17:03:00 +0800
+Subject: bin/install-qa-check.d/05prefix: prefixify init-script shebangs.
+
+Init scripts in /etc/init.d have OpenRC shebangs "#!/sbin/openrc-run".
+They should be prefixified like a executable script in a Prefix.
+
+Signed-off-by: Benda Xu <heroxbd@gentoo.org>
+Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/640658
+Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/1061
+Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
+--- a/bin/install-qa-check.d/05prefix
++++ b/bin/install-qa-check.d/05prefix
+@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ install_qa_check_prefix() {
+ 			fi
+ 			continue
+ 		fi
+-		# unprefixed shebang, is the script directly in ${PATH}?
+-		if [[ ":${PATH}:" == *":${fp}:"* ]] ; then
++		# unprefixed shebang, is the script directly in ${PATH} or an init script?
++		if [[ ":${PATH}:${EPREFIX}/etc/init.d:" == *":${fp}:"* ]] ; then
+ 			if [[ -e ${EROOT}${line[0]} || -e ${ED}${line[0]} ]] ; then
+ 				# is it unprefixed, but we can just fix it because a
+ 				# prefixed variant exists
+-- 
+cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258

sys-apps/portage/files/portage-ccache.conf

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Prevent ccache files from being cleaned
+x /var/tmp/ccache

sys-apps/portage/files/portage-tmpdir.conf

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+d /var/tmp/portage 0775 portage portage
+d /tmp/portage 0775 portage portage