calculate
/
gentoo-full-overlay
5
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '0dff21b2e2'
${ noResults }
gentoo-full-overlay/www-plugins/adobe-flash/ChangeLog

1064 lines
39 KiB
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Sync with portage [Mon Feb 6 16:39:48 MSK 2012].
13 years ago
# ChangeLog for www-plugins/adobe-flash
Sync with portage [Mon Feb 20 21:44:54 MSK 2012].
13 years ago
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/www-plugins/adobe-flash/ChangeLog,v 1.116 2012/02/20 09:26:03 jdhore Exp $
20 Feb 2012; Jeff Horelick <jdhore@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-11.1.102.62.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug 404101
20 Feb 2012; Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-11.1.102.62.ebuild:
Stable for AMD64, wrt security bug #404101
*adobe-flash-11.1.102.62 (20 Feb 2012)
20 Feb 2012; Tim Harder <radhermit@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-11.1.102.62.ebuild:
Version bump (bug #404101).
Sync with portage [Mon Feb 6 16:39:48 MSK 2012].
13 years ago
02 Dec 2011; Steve Dibb <beandog@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-11.1.102.55.ebuild:
amd64 stable, bug 390149
01 Dec 2011; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-11.1.102.55.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt bug #390149
28 Nov 2011; Jim Ramsay <jim_ramsay@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.3.183.7.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.3.183.10.ebuild,
adobe-flash-11.1.102.55.ebuild:
Bug #390405: Adjusting new SRC_URI. Also changing 11.1 to drop the rpm in
favour of .tar.gz distribution, and cleaning up an old version.
*adobe-flash-11.1.102.55 (28 Nov 2011)
28 Nov 2011; Jim Ramsay <jim_ramsay@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-11.1.102.55.ebuild:
Bug #390149: Flash player 11.1.102.55 is released
05 Oct 2011; Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-11.0.1.152.ebuild:
Unpack the uri properly, This was supposed to be in previous commit, dunno
why it didn't get there.
*adobe-flash-11.0.1.152 (05 Oct 2011)
05 Oct 2011; Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-11.0.1.129_rc201109061.ebuild, +adobe-flash-11.0.1.152.ebuild:
Add flash-11 final release because RCs are again unfetchable. Non-maintainer
commit.
25 Sep 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.183.10.ebuild:
Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Elijah "Armageddon" El
Lazkani & Agostino "Ago" Sarubbo in bug #384017.
25 Sep 2011; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.3.183.10.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug #384017
*adobe-flash-10.3.183.10 (23 Sep 2011)
23 Sep 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.3.183.10.ebuild:
Bug #384017: Version bump for security
*adobe-flash-11.0.1.129_rc201109061 (08 Sep 2011)
08 Sep 2011; Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131-r1.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-11.0.1.129_rc201109061.ebuild:
Add latest 11 release (RC). Drop older unfetchable versions of 11beta.
*adobe-flash-10.3.183.7 (02 Sep 2011)
02 Sep 2011; Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.3.183.5.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.3.183.7.ebuild:
Non-maintainer commit: add new 10.3 version that has fetchable sources.
Remove unfetchable versions. Also this release fixes security issues in older
10.3.
31 Aug 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082.ebuild:
Bug #380269: Fix invocation of dosym
12 Aug 2011; Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.183.5.ebuild:
x86 stable per bug 378637
11 Aug 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.183.5.ebuild:
Marked 10.3.183.5 stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Agostino "ago"
Sarubbo in security bug #378637.
11 Aug 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131-r1.ebuild,
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082.ebuild:
Fixed unpack for 32-bit-only on amd64 (Bug #376091)
11 Aug 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.3.183.5.ebuild,
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131-r1.ebuild,
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082.ebuild:
Fixing all QA warnings in all versions by adding all prebuild binaries to
QA_PREBUILT
*adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082 (11 Aug 2011)
*adobe-flash-10.3.183.5 (11 Aug 2011)
11 Aug 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.3.183.5.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201108082.ebuild:
Version 10.3.183.5 released for security bug #378637, and a new beta of 11
just for fun
23 Jul 2011; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild:
x86 stable, bug #375239
*adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131-r1 (18 Jul 2011)
18 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131-r1.ebuild:
Now installs flash-player-properties.desktop (Bug #375509)
17 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild:
Marking amd64 stable (Bug #375239)
17 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild, adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131.ebuild:
Fixing KDE install in 11.1 (Bug #375283), plus fixing up QA warnings as
mentioned in bug #375239.
15 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131.ebuild:
Updating license for flash 11
15 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.2.159.1.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.159.1_p201011173.ebuild:
Removing security-vulnerable 10.2 from the tree, especially since there is a
new beta with 64-bit support.
*adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131 (14 Jul 2011)
14 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-11.0.1.60_beta201107131.ebuild:
Version bump: Flash player 11 beta is out, and 64-bit support is back!
*adobe-flash-10.3.181.34 (13 Jul 2011)
13 Jul 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.3.181.34.ebuild:
Version bump: 10.3.181.34 is released (Bug #373463)
17 Jun 2011; Alex Legler <a3li@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.3.181.14-r1.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild:
amd64 stable for security bug 370215; removing vulnerable version
16 Jun 2011; Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild:
x86 stable per bug 370215
*adobe-flash-10.3.181.26 (15 Jun 2011)
15 Jun 2011; Alex Legler <a3li@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.3.181.22.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.3.181.26.ebuild:
Non-maintainer commit: Version bump for security bug 370215, removing
unneeded ~arch version
*adobe-flash-10.3.181.22 (14 Jun 2011)
14 Jun 2011; Alex Legler <a3li@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.3.181.22.ebuild:
Non-maintainer commit: Version bump for security bug 370215
01 Jun 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> metadata.xml:
Added local USE flag description for 'bindist' (Bug #369257)
27 May 2011; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.3.181.14-r1.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #367031
26 May 2011; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.3.181.14-r1.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug #367031
*adobe-flash-10.3.181.14-r1 (14 May 2011)
14 May 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.3.181.14.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.3.181.14-r1.ebuild:
Fix nspluginwrapper auto-install logic for amd64
14 May 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.289.0.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.1.102.64.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.2.152.27.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r1.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r2.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.2.153.1_p201011173.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.3.181.14.ebuild, metadata.xml:
Cleaning up many old, unfetchable, and security-vulnerable versions of Adobe
flash (Bugs #360529,#354207,#359019 to name a few)
Also updated the elog text in 10.3.181.14.
*adobe-flash-10.3.181.14 (14 May 2011)
14 May 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.3.181.14.ebuild,
metadata.xml:
Version bump: 10.3.181.14 is released. This does not include a 64-bit native
version (again), but does include a small gtk utility (and a Kde4 kcm add-on)
to manage some user settings. (Bug #367031)
20 Apr 2011; Christoph Mende <angelos@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.159.1.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #363179
17 Apr 2011; Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.2.159.1.ebuild:
x86 stable per bug 363179
*adobe-flash-10.2.159.1_p201011173 (17 Apr 2011)
*adobe-flash-10.2.159.1 (17 Apr 2011)
17 Apr 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.2.159.1.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.2.159.1_p201011173.ebuild:
Version bump for security bug #363179
14 Apr 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild:
Bug #324365: 32-bit flash player doesn't seem to have the same problems as
earlier versions, so removing warnings for 64-bit users.
28 Mar 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.2.153.1_p201011173.ebuild:
Removing nspluginwrapper USE flag, bug #360235
24 Mar 2011; Christoph Mende <angelos@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #359019
23 Mar 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.2.153.1_p201011173.ebuild, metadata.xml:
Defaulting USE=+nspluginwrapper since most amd64 users will be using this
(probably)
23 Mar 2011; Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild:
x86 stable per bug 359019
*adobe-flash-10.2.153.1_p201011173 (22 Mar 2011)
*adobe-flash-10.2.153.1 (22 Mar 2011)
22 Mar 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.2.153.1.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.2.153.1_p201011173.ebuild:
Version bump for security bug #359019
02 Mar 2011; Kevin McCarthy <signals@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-9.0.289.0.ebuild:
Changed gtk+ dep to slot 2 and bump EAPI for slot dep support.
21 Feb 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r2.ebuild:
memcpy-to-memmove.sh requires bash, no just any sh (Bug #354073)
*adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r2 (17 Feb 2011)
17 Feb 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r2.ebuild, +files/memcpy-to-memmove.sh:
Bug #354073: Patch 64-bit flash to fix memcpy issue with glibc-2.13
13 Feb 2011; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.152.27.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 354207
12 Feb 2011; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.152.27.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #354207
*adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r1 (11 Feb 2011)
11 Feb 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173-r1.ebuild:
Revbump for last fix to ensure it gets out there quickly and fixes
potentially half-broken installs
11 Feb 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173.ebuild:
Fixed 32-bit install which I horribly broke
*adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173 (10 Feb 2011)
*adobe-flash-10.2.152.27 (10 Feb 2011)
10 Feb 2011; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.2.152.27.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20100927.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20101117.ebuild, metadata.xml:
Version 10.2.152.27 is released (Security bug #354207)
Note: This also does a bit of a shuffle in where you may expect to see the
64-bit beta "square" release. Though the version number of the 64-bit plugin
is technically 10.3.162.29, this is part of the ebuild named
"adobe-flash-10.2.152.27_p201011173" This is mostly due to the fact that Adobe
does not have a corresponding 32-bit 10.3 beta release at this time, so I have
decided that until they do the main version number will correspond to the
32-bit release and the "patchlevel" will correspond to the date-tag of the
square beta release.
So while this may *look* like a downgrade, it's really an upgrade of the
32-bit plugin and a no-op for the 64-bit plugin.
*adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20101117 (01 Dec 2010)
01 Dec 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20101117.ebuild:
Next prerelease is ready (11-17-2010). Unfortunately Adobe has split up
the versions so the 32-bit version is actually internally versioned as
10.2.151.49 (went down) while the 64-bit version is now 10.3.162.29 (went
way up). So I'm keeping the ebulid version number the same (10.2.161.23)
and just bumping the prerelease version number for this one.
*adobe-flash-9.0.289.0 (15 Nov 2010)
15 Nov 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.283.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.289.0.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.1.85.3.ebuild:
New release of 9.0 bug #344803, plus old version cleanup
05 Nov 2010; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.102.64.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 343089
05 Nov 2010; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.102.64.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #343089
*adobe-flash-10.1.102.64 (05 Nov 2010)
05 Nov 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.1.102.64.ebuild:
Version bump: adobe-flash-10.1.102.64 is released (Security Bug #343089)
13 Oct 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.85.3.ebuild:
nsplugin should be in RDEPEND too (Bug #334377)
13 Oct 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r2.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.1.82.76.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.1.82.76-r1.ebuild:
Version cleanup: Removing 10.0 since 10.2 is the new more-secure release
with native 64-bit code, and removing 10.1.82.76 now that 10.1.85.3 is
stable
13 Oct 2010; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.85.3.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #337204
13 Oct 2010; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.85.3.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug #337204
*adobe-flash-10.1.85.3 (13 Oct 2010)
*adobe-flash-9.0.283.0 (13 Oct 2010)
13 Oct 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.280.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.283.0.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.1.85.3.ebuild:
Bump legacy 9.0 and release 10.1 for Security bug #337204 (Current preview
release of 10.2 is not affected)
09 Oct 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20100927.ebuild:
Fixed some logic and messages in pkg_postinst, thanks to report in Bug
#338050
*adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20100927 (09 Oct 2010)
09 Oct 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-adobe-flash-10.2.161.22_pre20100915.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.2.161.23_pre20100927.ebuild:
Next Square preview release is out, and the previous release now fails to
fetch. Bug #339551
17 Sep 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.2.161.22_pre20100915.ebuild:
Minor QA bug (trying to install readme.txt where there is no such file in
the Square release)
*adobe-flash-10.2.161.22_pre20100915 (17 Sep 2010)
17 Sep 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.2.161.22_pre20100915.ebuild:
Adobe Square (10.2 now with 64-bit support!) pre-release (Bug #337542)
*adobe-flash-9.0.280.0 (15 Aug 2010)
15 Aug 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.208.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.280.0.ebuild:
Oops, transposed 9.0.280 into 9.0.208 (Bug #332205)
13 Aug 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.82.76-r1.ebuild:
Fix nswrapper install issue and clean up ewarn/elog messages a bit
12 Aug 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.1.53.64-r1.ebuild:
Version cleanup
*adobe-flash-10.1.82.76-r1 (12 Aug 2010)
12 Aug 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.1.82.76-r1.ebuild,
metadata.xml:
Bring back nspluginwrapper for amd64, with warnings and a USE flag.
12 Aug 2010; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-9.0.208.0.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.1.82.76.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug #332205
11 Aug 2010; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-9.0.208.0.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.1.82.76.ebuild:
Stable on amd64. Security bug #332205
*adobe-flash-10.1.82.76 (11 Aug 2010)
*adobe-flash-9.0.208.0 (11 Aug 2010)
11 Aug 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-9.0.208.0.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-9.0.277.0.ebuild, -adobe-flash-9.0.277.0-r1.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.1.82.76.ebuild:
Version/security bump: Adobe flash 10.1.82.76 and 9.0.208.0 is released,
bug #332205.
26 Jul 2010; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64-r1.ebuild:
amd64 stable, bug 329913
26 Jul 2010; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64-r1.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt bug #329913
25 Jul 2010; Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-9.0.277.0.ebuild, adobe-flash-9.0.277.0-r1.ebuild:
Fix references for pkgmove from www-client/mozilla-firefox ->
www-client/firefox
*adobe-flash-10.1.53.64-r1 (20 Jul 2010)
*adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r2 (20 Jul 2010)
*adobe-flash-9.0.277.0-r1 (20 Jul 2010)
20 Jul 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-9.0.277.0-r1.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r2.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.1.53.64-r1.ebuild:
Move plugin install path to /opt/Adobe/flash-plugin (Bug #328639)
11 Jul 2010; Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
fix EMUL_DEPS, just list direct dependencies
28 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> files/mms.cfg:
Fix typo in /etc/adobe/mms.cfg file header
20 Jun 2010; Tobias Heinlein <keytoaster@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Use proper security terms.
20 Jun 2010; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 wrt bug #322855
19 Jun 2010; Pawel Hajdan jr <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security bug #322855
18 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Reintroduce ~amd64 for 10.1, but do not automatically invoke
nspluginwrapper (Bug #324365)
*adobe-flash-9.0.277.0 (17 Jun 2010)
17 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.262.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.277.0.ebuild:
Version 9 was also bumped (Bug #254011)
16 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
New license for version 10.1 (Bug #323837)
13 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Updating dependencies to >=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20100409
(Bug #323709)
11 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Major issues for amd64 with nspluginwrapper for 10.1: Removing ~amd64 from
that version until a better solution presents itself. Note: This means
that the 10.0 version for amd64 users has a known security bug.
*adobe-flash-10.1.53.64 (11 Jun 2010)
11 Jun 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +adobe-flash-10.1.53.64.ebuild:
Adobe-flash 10.1.53.64 is released, and fixes security vulnerability
CVE-2010-1297 (Bug #322855). Unfortunately there is no native 64bit
version, so amd64 users are going back to a 32bit plugin plus
nspluginwrapper.
03 May 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild:
Removing libflashsupport block (Bug #300294)
03 May 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild:
Removing libflashsupport block (Bug #300294)
03 May 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild:
Clean up RDEPEND a bit
30 Apr 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-9.0.262.0.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild, adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild:
freefont-ttf should have been liberation-fonts instead, bug #302176
*adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1 (27 Mar 2010)
27 Mar 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.0.45.2-r1.ebuild:
Revbump to address bug #286159 (Ensure *all* processors support the
lahf_lm instruction) and bug #311575 (No more flash-libcompat needed
thanks to >=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20100220)
04 Mar 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.0.42.34.ebuild:
Version cleanup (Secury bug #307749)
04 Mar 2010; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild:
stable amd64, security bug 307749
04 Mar 2010; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 307749
*adobe-flash-10.0.45.2 (12 Feb 2010)
*adobe-flash-9.0.262.0 (12 Feb 2010)
12 Feb 2010; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.260.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.262.0.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.0.45.2.ebuild:
Version bump: 10.0.45.2 is released (security/stability fix)
28 Dec 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.0.32.18.ebuild:
Version Cleanup: 10.0.32.18 has security holes, bug 296407
28 Dec 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.42.34.ebuild:
Block www-plugins/libflashsupport which is only required for adobe-flash-9
27 Dec 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.42.34.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 296407
18 Dec 2009; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-10.0.42.34.ebuild:
amd64 stable, bug 296407
*adobe-flash-10.0.42.34 (09 Dec 2009)
*adobe-flash-9.0.260.0 (09 Dec 2009)
09 Dec 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.246.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.260.0.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.0.42.34.ebuild:
Version bump: 10.0.42.34 is released
08 Dec 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> adobe-flash-9.0.246.0.ebuild,
adobe-flash-10.0.32.18.ebuild:
Removing reference to kde-flash.xml since it is no longer needed
*adobe-flash-9.0.246.0 (04 Aug 2009)
04 Aug 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-9.0.159.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-9.0.246.0.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild,
-adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r1.ebuild, -adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r2.ebuild:
Version cleanup
03 Aug 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.32.18.ebuild:
x86 stable, bug #278819
02 Aug 2009; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.32.18.ebuild:
Stable on amd64, security bug #278819
*adobe-flash-10.0.32.18 (02 Aug 2009)
02 Aug 2009; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.0.32.18.ebuild:
Version bump (bug #278819).
20 Jul 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r2.ebuild:
Use ^C-getCC for compiling the wrapper
*adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r2 (20 Jul 2009)
20 Jul 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r2.ebuild, +files/flashplugin-lahf-fix.c:
Bug #268336 continued -> Use Maks Verver's clever sighandler solution to
emulate the missing lahf instruction on affected platforms
15 Jul 2009; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever@gentoo.org>
adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r1.ebuild:
Set QA_DT_HASH to avoid QA warning about ignoring of LDFLAGS.
*adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r1 (14 Jul 2009)
14 Jul 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -adobe-flash-10.0.15.3.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.0.22.87-r1.ebuild, metadata.xml:
Bug #268336 -> Check for the lahf_lm flag in /proc/cpuinfo. If it is not
present, instruct the user to install the 32-bit version only.
*adobe-flash-10.0.22.87 (10 Apr 2009)
*adobe-flash-10.0.15.3 (10 Apr 2009)
*adobe-flash-9.0.159.0 (10 Apr 2009)
10 Apr 2009; Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> +files/mms.cfg,
+metadata.xml, +adobe-flash-9.0.159.0.ebuild,
+adobe-flash-10.0.15.3.ebuild, +adobe-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
Package moved from net-www/netscape-flash to www-plugins/adobe-flash,
bug 265569.
09 Apr 2009; Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
Update reference to nspluginwrapper, reflecting its move to www-plugins,
bug 265569.
08 Mar 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
amd64 stable, bug #260264
08 Mar 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 260264
26 Feb 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> metadata.xml,
netscape-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
Added new '32-bit' local USE flag which specifies whether amd64-multilib
platforms get both 32- and 64-bit plugins, or just the 64-bit one.
*netscape-flash-9.0.159.0 (25 Feb 2009)
25 Feb 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.152.0.ebuild, +netscape-flash-9.0.159.0.ebuild:
Bumped security fix for flash-player-9: 9.0.159.0
*netscape-flash-10.0.22.87 (25 Feb 2009)
25 Feb 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-10.0.21.1_alpha.ebuild, +netscape-flash-10.0.22.87.ebuild:
Version bump: 10.0.22.87 is released, for both 32-bit and 64-bit. Enjoy
the first multilib flash plugin ebuild.
*netscape-flash-9.0.152.0 (07 Jan 2009)
07 Jan 2009; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.151.0.ebuild, +netscape-flash-9.0.152.0.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild:
Version bump for netscape-flash-9 (Bug #254011), and version cleanup
23 Dec 2008; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.15.3.ebuild:
amd64/x86 stable, bug #251496
*netscape-flash-10.0.21.1_alpha (21 Dec 2008)
*netscape-flash-10.0.15.3 (21 Dec 2008)
21 Dec 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-10.0.15.3.ebuild, +netscape-flash-10.0.21.1_alpha.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Version bumps to both stable 32-bit and alpha 64-bit releases
Bug #251454 Bug #239543
01 Dec 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Bug 249135 - Added warning to 'firefox-bin' users
26 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild,
netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Oops, removed wrong 'inherit rpm'
25 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild:
Removed unneeded rpm dep (Bug #247311)
19 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Dependency and typo fixes from nightmorph, plus a note to nspluginwrapper
people
19 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Dependency and typo fixes from nightmorph, plus a note to nspluginwrapper
people
*netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha (17 Nov 2008)
17 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-10.0.20.7_alpha.ebuild:
Adding alpha release of 64-bit native flash player
*netscape-flash-9.0.151.0 (06 Nov 2008)
06 Nov 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.124.0.ebuild, +netscape-flash-9.0.151.0.ebuild:
New version 9.0.151.0 is released (security fixes)
23 Oct 2008; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild:
x86 stable, bug #239543
18 Oct 2008; Dawid Węgliński <cla@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 - security bug #239543
*netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1 (17 Oct 2008)
17 Oct 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> files/mms.cfg,
-netscape-flash-10.0.12.36.ebuild, +netscape-flash-10.0.12.36-r1.ebuild:
Defaulting AutoUpdateDisable=1 in the config file, and updated elog output
to help firefox and konqueror users.
17 Oct 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild:
Removing legacy version 7, which is known to have major vulnerabilities
(Bug 239543)
*netscape-flash-10.0.12.36 (15 Oct 2008)
15 Oct 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-10_rc20080915.ebuild, +netscape-flash-10.0.12.36.ebuild:
Adobe Flash 10.0.12.36 is released (Bug #242210)
*netscape-flash-10_rc20080915 (17 Sep 2008)
17 Sep 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> files/mms.cfg,
-netscape-flash-10_beta20080702.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-10_beta20080811.ebuild,
+netscape-flash-10_rc20080915.ebuild:
Next RC is released, and I reorganized the dependencies a bit: x86 no
longer needs 'flash-libcompat', and amd64 no longer needs xulrunner-bin
09 Sep 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> +files/mms.cfg,
netscape-flash-10_beta20080811.ebuild:
Added magic 'mms.cfg' file for system-wide security configuration. Also,
this file allows 'Windowless' mode to be disabled, which makes things much
more stable pre-firefox-3.02
25 Aug 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-10_beta20080811.ebuild:
Use a custom 'flash-libcompat' tarball which contains the libraries
previously used from app-text/acroread, to remove that dependency.
*netscape-flash-10_beta20080811 (22 Aug 2008)
22 Aug 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-10_beta20080811.ebuild:
Version bump (Bug #234542)
*netscape-flash-10_beta20080702 (03 Jul 2008)
03 Jul 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.115.0.ebuild, -netscape-flash-10_beta20080515.ebuild,
+netscape-flash-10_beta20080702.ebuild:
New beta version released (Bug #230598), and cleaning up a couple older
versions
17 Jun 2008; Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild, netscape-flash-9.0.115.0.ebuild,
netscape-flash-9.0.124.0.ebuild, netscape-flash-10_beta20080515.ebuild:
Add missing media-fonts/corefonts to DEPEND, see bug #227217.
*netscape-flash-10_beta20080515 (15 May 2008)
15 May 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-10_beta20080515.ebuild:
New beta version of FlashPlayer-10 is released (Bug #222231)
17 Apr 2008; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.124.0.ebuild:
x86 stable, security bug #204344
15 Apr 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> -netscape-flash-9.0.48.0.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-9.0.48.0-r1.ebuild:
Removing old (and broken ala bug #217799) versions
15 Apr 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-9.0.124.0.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 as per security #204344
*netscape-flash-9.0.124.0 (09 Apr 2008)
09 Apr 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.124.0.ebuild:
New version released with security fixes (Bug 204344)
17 Jan 2008; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta082207.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107.ebuild:
Upstream source no longer available for these beta versions (Bug #206210)
01 Jan 2008; Raúl Porcel <armin76@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.115.0.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt security #193519
30 Dec 2007; Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.115.0.ebuild:
amd64 stable - #193519
*netscape-flash-9.0.115.0 (04 Dec 2007)
04 Dec 2007; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.115.0.ebuild:
New version released (bug 201231)
*netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107 (02 Oct 2007)
02 Oct 2007; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107.ebuild:
New beta version released (Bug 194427)
06 Sep 2007; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta082207.ebuild:
Fix HOMEPAGE for the new beta version.
*netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta082207 (05 Sep 2007)
05 Sep 2007; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta082207.ebuild:
Adding the beta release with h.264 support (bug 189833)
*netscape-flash-9.0.48.0-r1 (19 Jul 2007)
19 Jul 2007; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org> metadata.xml,
+netscape-flash-9.0.48.0-r1.ebuild:
Adding rpm-based ebuild since the RPM is the only versioned download
available at this time. See bug 185141 for more details
14 Jul 2007; <tester@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-9.0.48.0.ebuild:
Remove file that no longer exists
13 Jul 2007; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
files/digest-netscape-flash-9.0.48.0, Manifest:
Seems like the files were changed upstream
*netscape-flash-9.0.48.0 (13 Jul 2007)
13 Jul 2007; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild, +netscape-flash-9.0.48.0.ebuild:
Security update, bugs #185141 and #185044
18 Feb 2007; Steve Dibb <beandog@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
amd64 stable, bug 167483
18 Feb 2007; Raúl Porcel <armin76@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
x86 stable wrt bug 167483
31 Jan 2007; Raúl Porcel <armin76@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild, netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
Remove net-www/gplflash blocker from DEPEND, bug 132922
27 Jan 2007; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
Add warning on installation of debug version
19 Jan 2007; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-9.0.21.78.ebuild, netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
Add debug version and standalone player, thanks to Jakub, closes bug #162600
17 Jan 2007; Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild, netscape-flash-9.0.21.78.ebuild,
netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild:
QA Fixes: deps should be -* arch arch not randomly -arch on some arches,
it's an x86 binary, also nostrip is deprecated in favor of strip.
*netscape-flash-9.0.31.0 (17 Jan 2007)
17 Jan 2007; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild, -netscape-flash-9.0.21.55.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-7.0.63.ebuild:
New release (non-beta)
*netscape-flash-9.0.21.78 (21 Nov 2006)
21 Nov 2006; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.21.78.ebuild:
New beta of flashplayer
01 Nov 2006; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.21.55.ebuild:
Remove meaninless use flag, bug #153185
23 Oct 2006; Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.21.55.ebuild:
Add dep on app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs for amd64.
21 Oct 2006; Stefan Schweizer <genstef@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-9.0.21.55.ebuild:
Readd gtk useflag for the standalone player thanks to Serkan Kaba
<serkan_kaba@yahoo.com> and Rick Harris <rickfharris@yahoo.com.au> in bug
152068
*netscape-flash-9.0.21.55 (19 Oct 2006)
19 Oct 2006; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-9.0.21.55.ebuild:
New beta version
30 Sep 2006; Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild:
Marked stable on amd64 for bug #147421
27 Sep 2006; Joshua Jackson <tsunam@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild:
Stable x86; security bug #147421
*netscape-flash-7.0.68 (27 Sep 2006)
27 Sep 2006; Chris White <chriswhite@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-7.0.68.ebuild:
Security bump for bug #147421.
05 Aug 2006; Chris White <chriswhite@gentoo.org>
-netscape-flash-6.0.79.ebuild, -netscape-flash-6.0.81.ebuild,
-netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild, -netscape-flash-7.0.61.ebuild:
Security punts for bug #140498.
20 Mar 2006; Michele Noberasco <s4t4n@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-7.0.63.ebuild:
Stable for x86 per security bug #102777. Added missing metadata.xml.
20 Mar 2006; Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.63.ebuild:
Stable on amd64 per security bug #102777
*netscape-flash-7.0.63 (19 Mar 2006)
19 Mar 2006; Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-7.0.63.ebuild:
Version bump for bug #102777. Added stricter to RESTRICT because upstream
binaries contain text relocations and there isn't much we can do about it.
25 Nov 2005; Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.61.ebuild:
Stable on x86; bug #112251
23 Nov 2005; <dang@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-7.0.61.ebuild:
Marked stable on amd64
*netscape-flash-7.0.61 (23 Nov 2005)
23 Nov 2005; Tavis Ormandy <taviso@gentoo.org>
+netscape-flash-7.0.61.ebuild:
security bump, security flaw found in the previous versions.
a secure gflashplayer is no longer available, and has therefore been dropped.
11 Aug 2005; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-6.0.79.ebuild, netscape-flash-6.0.81.ebuild,
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Call has_multilib_profile from pkg_setup instead of global scope.
03 May 2005; Herbie Hopkins <herbs@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Fixed amd64 DEPEND wrt bug #91324
04 Apr 2005; Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Fixed BUG #82060.
27 Mar 2005; Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Marked stable on amd64.
11 Feb 2005; Daniel Black <dragonheart@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
x86 keyword as per bug #81355 thanks to Pablo Trabajos <guaje1985@hotmail.com>
09 Jan 2005; Sven Wegener <swegener@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-6.0.79.ebuild, netscape-flash-6.0.81.ebuild,
netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Added missing parentheses in SRC_URI/*DEPEND/LICENSE.
*netscape-flash-7.0.25 (30 May 2004)
30 May 2004; Daniel Ahlberg <aliz@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-7.0.25.ebuild:
Version bump, found by Alexandru Toma <flash3001@yahoo.com> in #52120.
Fix readme.txt installation, closing #51017.
13 May 2004; Daniel Ahlberg <aliz@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0.81.ebuild:
x86 and amd64 unmask.
*netscape-flash-6.0.81 (16 Mar 2004)
16 Mar 2004; Daniel Ahlberg <aliz@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0.81.ebuild:
Version bump
04 Oct 2003; Joel Hill <hillster@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0.79.ebuild:
added RDEPEND to block it from being installed with net-www/gplflash
*netscape-flash-6.0.79 (09 Mar 2003)
09 Mar 2003; Daniel Ahlberg <aliz@gentoo.org> :
Security update.
*netscape-flash-6.0.69-r2 (07 Jan 2003)
07 Jan 2003; J Robert Ray <jrray@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0.69-r2 :
Changed the ebuild to not strip the binaries, stripping causes the
gflashplayer program to segfault. Fixes bug 12672.
*netscape-flash-6.0.69-r1 (13 Feb 2003)
13 Jul 2003; Daniel Ahlberg <aliz@gentoo.org> :
Added missing changelog entry.
*netscape-flash-6.0.68 (18 Dec 2002)
19 Dec 2002; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0.69-r1 :
Moved to stable, as the lib-compat upgrade fixes this nicely.
18 Dec 2002; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-6.0.69-r1.ebuild files/digest-netscape-flash-6.0.69-r1 :
Added lib-compat-1.1 (with gcc2's libstdc++) as a DEPEND
*netscape-flash-6.0.69 (16 Dec 2002)
16 Dec 2002; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-6.0.69.ebuild files/digest-netscape-flash-6.0.69 :
Version bump, and removed all the other versions. Many thanks to:
warren@togami.com (Warren Togami) for providing mirrors and properly
versioned tarballs :) (see bug #11757) Also added the optional standalone
GTK (1.2) flash player, with the "gtk" use flag enabled.
*netscape-flash-6.0b-r1 (21 Nov 2002)
06 Dec 2002; Rodney Rees <manson@gentoo.org> : changed sparc ~sparc keywords
21 Nov 2002; phoen][x <phoenix@gentoo.org> netscape-flash-6.0b-r1.ebuild,
files/digest-netscape-flash-6.0b-r1 :
Switched to the new nsplugins layout.
*netscape-flash-6.0b (21 Oct 2002)
21 Oct 2002; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> :
Semi-new ebuild per #9435 ... finally flash works in moz/konq on 3.x ;D
*netscape-flash-5.0.51 (21 Oct 2002)
21 Oct 2002; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> :
Version bump per #9422
*netscape-flash-5.0.50 (19 Aug 2002)
19 Aug 2002; Sascha Schwabbauer <cybersystem@gentoo.org> ChangeLog, netscape-flash-5.0.50.ebuild :
Added -ppc to the keywords.
12 Aug 2002; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
netscape-flash-5.0.50.ebuild files/digest-netscape-flash-5.0.50 :
Version bump. This is a security fix.
*netscape-flash-5.0.48 (29 Apr 2002)
29 Apr 2002; Bart Verwilst <verwilst@gentoo.org> ChangeLog :
New version, removed older 5.0.x version.
*netscape-flash-5.0.47-r4 (17 Feb 2002)
17 Feb 2002; Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org> ChangeLog :
The ebuild now correctly fetches the source archive, instead of asking the
user to manually download it.
*netscape-flash-5.0.47-r3 (1 Feb 2002)
1 Feb 2002; G.Bevin <gbevin@gentoo.org> ChangeLog :
Added initial ChangeLog which should be updated whenever the package is
updated in any way. This changelog is targetted to users. This means that the
comments should well explained and written in clean English. The details about
writing correct changelogs are explained in the skel.ChangeLog file which you
can find in the root directory of the portage repository.