gentoo-overlay/dev-libs/c-blosc/files/c-blosc-1.21.4-no-unaligned.patch

Causes SIGBUS on armv7 (at least in jiji's arm32-on-arm64 chroot) in Pandas test
suite. Unaligned access is UB anyway.
--- a/blosc/blosc-common.h
+++ b/blosc/blosc-common.h
@@ -43,28 +43,6 @@
  */
 #if !defined(BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN)
 #define BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__386) || defined (__amd64)  /* GNU C, Sun Studio */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__i486__) || defined(__i586__) || defined(__i686__)  /* GNU C */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(_M_IX86) || defined(_M_X64)   /* Intel, MSVC */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__386)
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(_X86_) /* MinGW */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__I86__) /* Digital Mars */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-/* Seems like unaligned access in ARM (at least ARMv6) is pretty
-   expensive, so we are going to always enforce strict alignment in ARM.
-   If anybody suggest that newer ARMs are better, we can revisit this. */
-/* #elif defined(__ARM_FEATURE_UNALIGNED) */  /* ARM, GNU C */
-/* #undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN */
-#elif defined(_ARCH_PPC) || defined(__PPC__)
-/* Modern PowerPC systems (like POWER8) should support unaligned access
-   quite efficiently. */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#endif
 #endif
 
 #if defined(__SSE2__)