You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
gentoo-overlay/metadata/glsa/glsa-201110-04.xml

79 lines
3.2 KiB

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE glsa SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/glsa.dtd">
<glsa id="201110-04">
<title>Dovecot: Multiple vulnerabilities</title>
<synopsis>Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Dovecot, the worst of which
allowing for remote execution of arbitrary code.
</synopsis>
<product type="ebuild">Dovecot</product>
<announced>2011-10-10</announced>
<revised count="2">2011-10-10</revised>
<bug>286844</bug>
<bug>293954</bug>
<bug>314533</bug>
<bug>368653</bug>
<access>remote</access>
<affected>
<package name="net-mail/dovecot" auto="yes" arch="*">
<unaffected range="rge">1.2.17</unaffected>
<unaffected range="ge">2.0.13</unaffected>
<vulnerable range="lt">2.0.13</vulnerable>
</package>
</affected>
<background>
<p>Dovecot is an IMAP and POP3 server written with security primarily in
mind.
</p>
</background>
<description>
<p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Dovecot. Please review
the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
</p>
</description>
<impact type="high">
<p>A remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to cause the
remote execution of arbitrary code, or a Denial of Service condition, to
conduct directory traversal attacks, corrupt data, or disclose
information.
</p>
</impact>
<workaround>
<p>There is no known workaround at this time.</p>
</workaround>
<resolution>
<p>All Dovecot 1 users should upgrade to the latest version:</p>
<code>
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "&gt;=net-mail/dovecot-1.2.17"
</code>
<p>All Dovecot 2 users should upgrade to the latest version:</p>
<code>
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "&gt;=net-mail/dovecot-2.0.13"
</code>
<p>NOTE: This is a legacy GLSA. Updates for all affected architectures are
available since May 28, 2011. It is likely that your system is already no
longer affected by this issue.
</p>
</resolution>
<references>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-3235">CVE-2009-3235</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-3897">CVE-2009-3897</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-0745">CVE-2010-0745</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3304">CVE-2010-3304</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3706">CVE-2010-3706</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3707">CVE-2010-3707</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3779">CVE-2010-3779</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3780">CVE-2010-3780</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1929">CVE-2011-1929</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2166">CVE-2011-2166</uri>
<uri link="https://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2167">CVE-2011-2167</uri>
</references>
<metadata timestamp="2011-10-07T23:37:19Z" tag="requester">craig</metadata>
<metadata timestamp="2011-10-10T20:22:02Z" tag="submitter">craig</metadata>
</glsa>